<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Introduction to Philosophy (Spring 2008)</title>
	<link>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com</link>
	<description>Brandon Watson's PHIL 1301 Course</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 22:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>
	<language>en</language>

		<item>
		<title>Feminist Ethics</title>
		<link>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/25/40/</link>
		<comments>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/25/40/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 22:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/25/40/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Those who were interested in the discussion&nbsp;of feminist ethics&nbsp;may also be interested in the following resources:
	* Feminist Ethics at the SEP
	* Feminist Bioethics at the SEP
	* Charlotte Perkins Gilman&rsquo;s science fiction classic Herland
	* The Feminist Philosophers blog
	* Mary Wollstonecraft&rsquo;s 18th-century classic A Vindication of the Rights of Woman
	* John Stuart Mill&rsquo;s The Subjection of Women
	* [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Those who were interested in the discussion&nbsp;of feminist ethics&nbsp;may also be interested in the following resources:</p>
	<p>* <a href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-ethics/" target="_self">Feminist Ethics</a> at the SEP</p>
	<p>* <a href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminist-bioethics/" target="_self">Feminist Bioethics</a> at the SEP</p>
	<p>* Charlotte Perkins Gilman&rsquo;s science fiction classic <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/32" target="_self">Herland</a></p>
	<p>* The <a href="http://feministphilosophers.wordpress.com/" target="_self">Feminist Philosophers</a> blog</p>
	<p>* Mary Wollstonecraft&rsquo;s 18th-century classic <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/3420" target="_self">A Vindication of the Rights of Woman</a></p>
	<p>* John Stuart Mill&rsquo;s <a href="http://www.constitution.org/jsm/women.htm" target="_self">The Subjection of Women</a></p>
	<p>* Adrienne Rich&rsquo;s <a href="http://www.terry.uga.edu/~dawndba/4500compulsoryhet.htm" target="_self">Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence</a></p>
	<p>* Connell and Messerschmidt, <a href="http://www.usm.maine.edu/crm/faculty/jim/hegemonic.pdf" target="_self">Hegemonic Masculinity</a>&nbsp;(PDF)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/25/40/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reflection Paper #4</title>
		<link>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/22/reflection-paper-4/</link>
		<comments>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/22/reflection-paper-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/22/reflection-paper-4/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	The fourth reflection paper assignment is up on the Reflection Paper Assignments page.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The fourth reflection paper assignment is up on the <a href="http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/reflection-paper-assignments/" target="_self">Reflection Paper Assignments page</a>.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/22/reflection-paper-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feminist Epistemology Resources</title>
		<link>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/21/feminist-epistemology-resources/</link>
		<comments>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/21/feminist-epistemology-resources/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/21/feminist-epistemology-resources/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Here is a sample of resources in feminist epistemology.
	* Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science at the SEP
	* Feminist Social Epistemology at the SEP
	* Feminist Epistemology at the IEP&nbsp;
	* Sharon Crasnow&rsquo;s paper, Feminist Philosophy of Science: &lsquo;Standpoint&rsquo; and Knowledge (PDF)
	* Laura Aline Ward&rsquo;s thesis, Objectivity in Feminist Philosophy of Science (PDF)&nbsp;
	* The Knowledge and Experience [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Here is a sample of resources in feminist epistemology.</p>
	<p>* <a href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-epistemology/" target="_self">Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science</a> at the SEP</p>
	<p>* <a href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminist-social-epistemology/" target="_self">Feminist Social Epistemology</a> at the SEP</p>
	<p>* <a href="http://www.iep.utm.edu/f/fem-epis.htm" target="_self">Feminist Epistemology</a> at the IEP&nbsp;</p>
	<p>* Sharon Crasnow&rsquo;s paper, <a href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-epistemology/" target="_self">Feminist Philosophy of Science: &lsquo;Standpoint&rsquo; and Knowledge</a> (PDF)</p>
	<p>* Laura Aline Ward&rsquo;s thesis, <a href="http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-12132004-152536/unrestricted/thesis.pdf" target="_self">Objectivity in Feminist Philosophy of Science</a> (PDF)&nbsp;</p>
	<p>* The <a href="http://knowledgeandexperience.blogspot.com/" target="_self">Knowledge and Experience</a> blog&nbsp;</p>
	<p>*&nbsp; Charlotte Perkins Gilman&rsquo;s short story, <a href="http://www.library.csi.cuny.edu/dept/history/lavender/wallpaper.html" target="_self">The Yellow Wallpaper</a> and her short essay <a href="http://www.library.csi.cuny.edu/dept/history/lavender/whyyw.html" target="_self">Why I Wrote The Yellow Wallpaper</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/21/feminist-epistemology-resources/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duhem at the SEP</title>
		<link>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/17/duhem-at-the-sep/</link>
		<comments>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/17/duhem-at-the-sep/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/17/duhem-at-the-sep/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Those who are interested in learning more about Pierre Duhem might want to read Ariew&#8217;s excellent article on him at the SEP.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Those who are interested in learning more about Pierre Duhem might want to read <a href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/duhem/" target="_self">Ariew&#8217;s excellent article on him at the SEP</a>.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/17/duhem-at-the-sep/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hume Podcast</title>
		<link>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/14/hume-podcast/</link>
		<comments>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/14/hume-podcast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 02:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/14/hume-podcast/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	There is a very nice podcast at philosophy bites,&nbsp;interviewing Peter Millican (an excellent&nbsp;Hume scholar)&nbsp;on the philosophical significance of David Hume. If you found our discussion of Hume&#8217;s argument on miracles interesting, I recommend you listen to it; the miracles argument makes a showing.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>There is a <a href="http://nigelwarburton.typepad.com/philosophy_bites/2008/04/peter-millican.html" target="_self">very nice podcast</a> at <em>philosophy bites</em>,&nbsp;interviewing Peter Millican (an excellent&nbsp;Hume scholar)&nbsp;on the philosophical significance of David Hume. If you found our discussion of Hume&#8217;s argument on miracles interesting, I recommend you listen to it; the miracles argument makes a showing.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/14/hume-podcast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Early Modern Philosophy Thought for the Day</title>
		<link>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/10/early-modern-philosophy-thought-for-the-day-5/</link>
		<comments>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/10/early-modern-philosophy-thought-for-the-day-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/10/early-modern-philosophy-thought-for-the-day-5/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	&quot;Men would never be superstitious, if they could govern all their circumstances by set rules, or if they were always favoured by fortune: but being frequently driven into straits where rules are useless, and being often kept fluctuating pitiably between hope and fear by the uncertainty of fortune&rsquo;s greedily coveted favours, they are consequently, for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>&quot;Men would never be superstitious, if they could govern all their circumstances by set rules, or if they were always favoured by fortune: but being frequently driven into straits where rules are useless, and being often kept fluctuating pitiably between hope and fear by the uncertainty of fortune&rsquo;s greedily coveted favours, they are consequently, for the most part, very prone to credulity. The human mind is readily swayed this way or that in times of doubt, especially when hope and fear are struggling for the mastery, though usually it is boastful, over - confident, and vain.&quot;</strong> </p>
	<p>Spinoza, <a href="http://home.earthlink.net/~tneff/index3.htm" target="_self">Tractatus Theologico-Politicus</a>, Preface. You can read more about Spinoza (1632-1677), one of the major Cartesians, at the <a href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/spinoza/" target="_self">SEP</a> and at the <a href="http://www.iep.utm.edu/s/spinoza.htm" target="_self">IEP</a>. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/10/early-modern-philosophy-thought-for-the-day-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Early Modern Philosophy Thought for the Day</title>
		<link>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/08/early-modern-philosophy-thought-for-the-day-4/</link>
		<comments>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/08/early-modern-philosophy-thought-for-the-day-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 15:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/08/early-modern-philosophy-thought-for-the-day-4/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	  &quot;The sceptic asks me, Why do you believe the existence of the external object which you perceive? This belief, sir, is none of my manufacture; it came from the mint of Nature; it bears her image and superscription; and, if it is not right, the fault is not mine: I even took it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>  &quot;The sceptic asks me, Why do you believe the existence of the external object which you perceive? This belief, sir, is none of my manufacture; it came from the mint of Nature; it bears her image and superscription; and, if it is not right, the fault is not mine: I even took it upon trust, and without suspicion. Reason, says the sceptic, is the only judge of truth, and you ought to throw off every opinion and every belief that is not grounded on reason. Why, sir, should I believe the faculty of reason more than that of perception? &mdash; they came both out of the same shop, and were made by the same artist; and if he puts one piece of false ware into my hands, what should hinder him from putting another?&quot;</strong>  </p>
	<p>Thomas Reid, An Inquiry into the Human Mind, ch. 6, section 20. Thomas Reid was a leading representative of Scottish Common Sense Philosophy. You can read more about Reid at the <a href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/reid/" target="_self">SEP</a> (and about his context <a href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scottish-18th/" target="_self">here</a>). </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/08/early-modern-philosophy-thought-for-the-day-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reading for Hume and Shepherd Section</title>
		<link>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/03/reading-for-hume-and-shepherd-section/</link>
		<comments>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/03/reading-for-hume-and-shepherd-section/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 17:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/03/reading-for-hume-and-shepherd-section/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	After we finish Descartes we will do a short section on David Hume and Lady Mary Shepherd. Those of you who prefer to get a headstart may want to start the readings. They are:
	&nbsp;David Hume, Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Section X (&#8217;Of Miracles&#8217;). This is relatively easy to find, both in libraries and online. Some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>After we finish Descartes we will do a short section on David Hume and Lady Mary Shepherd. Those of you who prefer to get a headstart may want to start the readings. They are:</p>
	<p>&nbsp;David Hume, Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Section X (&#8217;Of Miracles&#8217;). This is relatively easy to find, both in libraries and online. Some places you can find it online (any one of these will do):</p>
	<p><a href="http://18th.eserver.org/hume-enquiry.html#10" target="_self">I</a> - <a href="http://18th.eserver.org/hume-enquiry.html#10" target="_self"></a><a href="http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/%7Erbear/hume/hume10.html" target="_self">II</a> - <a href="http://www.etext.leeds.ac.uk/hume/ehu/ehupbsb.htm#index-div2-N966696959" target="_self">III</a> - <a href="http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/h/hume/david/h92e/chapter10.html" target="_self">IV</a> - <a href="http://www.soci.niu.edu/~phildept/Dye/HumeOfMiracles.html" target="_self">V</a> - <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/etext06/8echu10h.htm#section10" target="_self">VI</a> </p>
	<p>&nbsp;</p>
	<p>Lady Mary Shepherd, Essays on the Perception of an External Universe, Essay VIII (&#8217;That human testimony is of sufficient force to establish the credibility of miracles&#8217;). This is harder to find, so I&#8217;ll be handing out a hardcopy in class. To read it online, go to page 325 at <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=NH3q6FDQffQC" target="_self">this Google Book page</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/03/reading-for-hume-and-shepherd-section/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Early Modern Philosophy Thought for the Day</title>
		<link>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/03/early-modern-philosophy-thought-for-the-day-3/</link>
		<comments>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/03/early-modern-philosophy-thought-for-the-day-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 16:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/03/early-modern-philosophy-thought-for-the-day-3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	
&quot;By which it appears that there are some degrees of Knowledge necessary before there can be any &nbsp;Human Acts, for till we are capable of Chusing our own Actions and directing them by some Principle, tho we Move and Speak and so many such like things, we live not the Life of a Rational Creature [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<div class="storycontent">
<p><strong>&quot;By which it appears that there are some degrees of Knowledge necessary before there can be <em>any</em> &nbsp;Human Acts, for till we are capable of Chusing our own Actions and directing them by some Principle, tho we Move and Speak and so many such like things, we live not the Life of a Rational Creature but only of an Animal.&nbsp; If it be farther demanded what these Principles are? Not to dispute the Number of &lsquo;em here, no body I suppose will deny us one, which is, <em>That we ought as much as we can to endeavour the Perfecting of our Beings, and that we be as happy as possibly we may.</em> &nbsp;For this we see is Natural to every Creature of what sort soever, which endeavours to be in as good Condition as its Nature and Circumstances will permit.&nbsp; And now we have got a Principle which one would think were sufficient for the Conduct of our Actions thro&#8217; the whole Course of our Lives; and so indeed it were, Cou&rsquo;d we as easily discern, wherein our Happiness consists as &rsquo;tis natural to wish and desire it.&quot;</strong></p>
	<p>Mary Astell, <a target="_self" href="http://www.luminarium.org/eightlit/astell/proposal2exc.php">A Serious Proposal to the Ladies Part II</a>. Mary Astell (1666-1731) was a self-taught philosopher, and one of a number of important women philosophers in this period. You can read more about Astell at the <a target="_self" href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/astell/">SEP</a>&nbsp;and find further information, including&nbsp;selections from her works, at <a target="_self" href="http://www.luminarium.org/eightlit/astell/">Luminarium</a>.</p>
  </div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/03/early-modern-philosophy-thought-for-the-day-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Early Modern Philosophy Thought for the Day</title>
		<link>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/01/early-modern-philosophy-thought-for-the-day-2/</link>
		<comments>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/01/early-modern-philosophy-thought-for-the-day-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/01/early-modern-philosophy-thought-for-the-day-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	
&quot;Let us suppose that a man, fallen from the clouds, walks the earth continuously in a straight line, I mean, in one of those great circles by which geographers divide it, and that nothing prevents him from traveling. Could he, after several days&rsquo; journey, decide that the earth is infinite, because he did not find [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<div class="storycontent">
<p><strong>&quot;Let us suppose that a man, fallen from the clouds, walks the earth continuously in a straight line, I mean, in one of those great circles by which geographers divide it, and that nothing prevents him from traveling. Could he, after several days&rsquo; journey, decide that the earth is infinite, because he did not find its end? If he were wise and reserved in judgment, he would believe it to be quite large, but he would not judge it to be infinite. And as a result of walking, finding himself at the same place from which he departed, he would realise that he had actually gone around it. However, when the mind thinks of intelligible extension, when it seeks to measure the idea of space, it sees clearly that it is infinite. It cannot doubt that this idea is inexhaustible.&quot;</strong></p>
	<p>Nicolas Malebranche, Dialogues on Metaphysics and on Religion, I.IX (<a target="_self" href="http://www.cambridge.org/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=0521574358">Jolley-Scott translation</a>, p. 15). By &lsquo;intelligible extension&rsquo; and &lsquo;the idea of space&rsquo; here, Malebranche means the sort of extension and space studied by geometers. You can find out more about Malebranche (1638-1715) at the <a target="_self" href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/malebranche/">SEP</a>, which also has an article on his <a target="_self" href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/malebranche-ideas/">theory of ideas</a>.</p>
  </div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bwatsonspring08.blogsome.com/2008/04/01/early-modern-philosophy-thought-for-the-day-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
